Religious
Revival in Modern
Neslihan Çevik
Postdoctoral
Fellow, Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture,
Contemporary
In my current book project, I argue that these new
institutions, from Islamic hotels to civil associations, embody a new type of Islamic
orthodoxy, which I term as Muslimism. Neither fundamentalist rejection nor
liberal submission, Muslimism embraces aspects of modern life while submitting
that life to a sacred, moral order resulting in a hybrid identity frame. Within
that frame, the aim is not that of capturing the state but to contrive a
lifestyle in which the individual-believer can be incorporated into modernity
while entertaining and preserving an Islam-proper living. This does not mean
Muslimism is a mere cultural expression. Muslimists engage the political space
by exerting civic pressure, promoting new elites – such as the Muslimist
electoral support to the Justice and Development Party– and new policies—in
particular to push state polices and the laic model of secularism towards more
neutral and democratic lines.
Based on an historical reading, the project
identified the mechanisms (agents, conditions, and social spaces) that
generated Muslimism, and the empirical analysis (mainly based on interviews
with leaders of pro-Islamic civil and political organizations that are
identifiable as Muslimists) mapped the Muslimist discourse to identify its core
characteristics. These characteristics include for example cherishing of
conciliatory politics, cultural tolerance, political liberalization,
individuation, voluntary associations, and globalist objectives (both in terms
of IR and culture) and repudiation of cultural conservatism, authoritarianism,
literalism, polarization, and traditionalism.